HomeNewsWho We AreMissionMembershipEventsPhotosContact / Links
National Clergy Council
 
Inaugural Prayers Will Remain!
 

Read our past articles here!

From Our Members

Read articles from members of the NCC family

News Releases

Releases to the National Press

 

1/15/05

 

Rev. Rob Schenck (center, right background) addresses reporters Thursday after leading a brief prayer service in front of the E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Court Room in Washington, D.C where atheist activist Michael Newdow is suing to block President Bush from having ministers offer prayers during his upcoming Inaugural ceremony. Judge John Bates said he will issue his ruling by the end-of-business Friday.

-------

Judge John Bates has ruled against atheist activist Michael Newdow who had asked the federal court to block President Bush and the congressional committee responsible for the Inauguration from including prayers in its program on January 20.

This is the second time Newdow has sued to stop ministers--or anyone--from offering a prayer at the Inaugural ceremonies. As in this case, he had also failed to convince a judge in 2001 that such prayers violated the establishment clause of the First Amendment.

The Judge in this recent case said that from the start there was serious doubt as to whether Mr. Newdow could ever win his case, and furthermore, that because he had sued before for the same thing, the law did not allow him to try again.

"Given the significant doubt that his action can proceed in the face of substantial questions relating to issue preclusion and standing, and the absence of a clearly established violation of the Establishment Clause, the court concludes that Newdow has not satisfied the threshold requirement for extraordinary relief . . ." wrote Judge Bates in his summary denying a preliminary injunction or order banning the prayers.

As to Mr. Newdow’s claim that being present at the Inaugural, as he plans to be, and having everyone bow their heads in prayer while he won’t will cause him “substantial harm,” Judge said he just didn’t find that credible.

"Newdow's alleged injury remains somewhat tenuous, not concrete. He simply wishes not to have to confront any religious expression during the Inauguration. But he has the means at hand to avoid that abstract injury."

Mr. Newdow is expected to file an appeal.